
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
UK clothing inflation climbs as Middle East turmoil threatens wider price rises - 2
'The Beast in Me' arrives on Netflix: Is it based on a true story? And what drew Claire Danes to it? What to know about the thriller series. - 3
Space station changes command, setting stage for Crew 11 departure - 4
‘This year nearly broke me as a scientist’ – US researchers reflect on how 2025’s science cuts have changed their lives - 5
Reality TV star Spencer Pratt, who lost his home in Palisades Fire, is running for mayor of Los Angeles
Brazil Passes Law to Use Seized Bitcoin, Crypto to Fund Public Security Measures
Glamour Shots once ruled the mall. I went to one of the last ones standing.
What's A Decent FICO rating?
Zendaya serves bridal-coded fashion with old, new and borrowed gowns for ‘The Drama’ press tour
Figure out How to Establish a long term connection with Your Handshake
‘Extraordinary’ Iron Age war trumpet uncovered in England
Pat Finn, actor from 'The Middle,' dies at 60 after bladder cancer diagnosis
Energy agency chief warns of 'black April' for oil supplies
Dominating Online Entertainment Showcasing: 7 Hints for Organizations












